UN maneuvers to create “Global Gun Control”

In October unbeknownst to most of us, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the Obama administration would reverse the Bush administration’s opposition to the UN’s proposed International Small Arms Treaty. This will clear the way for the treaty to reach a vote by the U.N. General Assembly. Seven countries, led by the British, are trying to restart U.N. efforts to restrict imports and exports of small arms. The goal is to “regulate the global arms trade” and “prevent the illegal transfer of guns.”

John Duncan, Britain’s ambassador for multilateral arms control and disarmament, describes the UN’s disarmament committee as launching point for a global treaty. The British believe their very stringent gun laws are the right direction for all countries. Now they intend to use the United Nations to bring their gun control model to the United States.

The irony of this effort is that since virtually banning guns in 1997, the UK has watched violent crime skyrocket by as much as 77% in some studies. The British Mail Online reports, “In the decade following [the election of the Labor Party] in 1997, the number of recorded violent attacks soared by 77 percent to 1.158 million – more than two every minute.” As a result the U.K. now has the highest violent crime rate in the European Union.

So what could this treaty require of its’ signatories, here is a quick overview according to The National Association For Gun Rights:  

If passed by the UN and ratified by the U.S. Senate, the UN “Small Arms Treaty” would almost certainly FORCE national governments to:

  • Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding citizens cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;
  • CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL “unauthorized” civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);
  • BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;
  • Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the UN Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme. To the petty dictators and one-worlders who control the UN, the U.S. isn’t a “shining city on a hill” — it’s an affront to their grand totalitarian designs for the globe. These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide oppressive power they crave.  Ultimately, the UN’s Small Arms Treaty is designed to register, ban and CONFISCATE firearms owned by private citizens like YOU.” So Patriots, here is yet another plan designed to usurp your rights which we need to defeat in 2010.

The gun-grabbers in the Obama administration and at the U.N. do not want us to have time to react and mobilize gun owners to defeat this radical treaty which if ratified steps on our 2nd Amendment rights. They (the UN) have been unsuccessfully trying to ram the “Treaty on Small Arms” down our throats since the mid-1990s. But this time they have an administration that appears willing to play along. The risk is high and the stakes are higher!

Wake up, America! Attempts to thwart our freedoms should be no surprise the anti-gun attitude of the current administration. We must turn the heat up on the U.S. Senate now before it’s too late! It takes 67 Senators to vote to ratify a treaty. Every freedom loving citizen needs to contact their Senator and tell them to vote against any attempt to ratify this treaty. This is just another attempt to give the U.N. jurisdiction over U.S. policy. On the heels of Obama’s recent Executive Order to provide Interpol with diplomatic level immunity from U.S. law and Constitutional behavior this is another slap in the face to our sovereignty.

You can sign the NAGR’s internet petition at: http://www.nagr.org/UNpetition1.aspx?pid=n1a

Restore the Republic, Reject Global Governance!

“…to disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them…” – George Mason

“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press.” – Thomas Jefferson

13 responses to “UN maneuvers to create “Global Gun Control”

  1. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I didn’t realize this was out there. I think as we go along, we are going to be more and more pressured to ratify all these UN treaties.

    I think I’ll do some surfing and see what other treaties are out there threatening our sovereignity. I also know about the climate ones and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

  2. Pingback: UN maneuvers to create “Global Gun Control” « Uncommon Sense « Politically Incorrect

  3. Pingback: “Ya want my guns? Come and get ‘em!” « Lster921's Blog

  4. Pingback: UN Maneuvers to Create “Global Gun Control” « Reboot The Republic

  5. Pingback: UN Maneuvers to Create ‘Global Gun Control’ with Obama’s Help : USACTION NEWS

    • It always starts as something else and once it is in place the scope is expanded. Don’t be naive. This is a trojan horse. Need proof look no further than “health care reform” which has turned into a government health care takeover. America is a sovereign nation – let’s keep it that way!

  6. Pingback: UN maneuvers to create “Global Gun Control” | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  7. The first time we fought the British, the shooting started when they came to get the colonists weapons. Are they really dumb enough to try again?

  8. Pingback: UN maneuvers to create “Global Gun Control” « Uncommon Sense « Chimerahappens's Blog

  9. OVER MY DEAD BODY.

    OVER MY DEAD BODY.

    OVER MY DEAD BODY.

  10. Watch this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nf1OgV449g

    Guns are “bad” because they’re dangerous, right?

    By that logic, so are knives, chain saws, and baseball bats.

    What is true is that a well trained, well armed population is less likely to take BS from invaders, criminals and their own government.

    It works for Switzerland and it works for Americans that live in states with conceal and carrying laws.

    Why would you give up your right to defend yourself from your own government? DUMB MOVE

  11. Generally I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so, Excellent post!

  12. Well, Obama’s approval ratings cannot get lower, so why the hell not. He might as well set the constitution on fire, call for martial law and surender to the UN.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s